27th Apr 2009
Swine flu is coming, what’s priority #1?
“We will call it Mexican flu. We won’t call it swine flu,” said Mr Litzman, who belongs to the ultra-religious United Torah Judaism party. — BBC
Look, if you don’t like the term “swine flu”, just call it H1N1, which is more accurate than “swine flu” anyway. Making up an alternative casual term is fairly silly (and, in this case, not terribly kind to Mexico who just happened to get stuck with the initial outbreak)… but it is also a telling statement of just how well-prepared you are to handle a potential pandemic.
(I also don’t really understand why you’d want to avoid naming diseases after a unclean animals anyway — is “Mexican Flu” somehow healthier?)
“We will call it Mexican flu. We won’t call it swine flu,” said Mr Litzman, who belongs to the ultra-religious United Torah Judaism party. — BBC
Look, if you don’t like the term “swine flu”, just call it H1N1, which is more accurate than “swine flu” anyway. Making up an alternative casual term is fairly silly (and, in this case, not terribly kind to Mexico who just happened to get stuck with the initial outbreak)… but it is also a telling statement of just how well-prepared you are to handle a potential pandemic.
(I also don’t really understand why you’d want to avoid naming diseases after a unclean animals anyway — is “Mexican Flu” somehow healthier?)
Posted in just plain weird, load of hooey, modern examples, religion, science & medicine | 2 Comments »













